1813-: Why & How Bishops in India were appointed by Govt. Book: The Making of Indian Secularism: Empire, Law & Christianity, 1830-1960
by N. Chatterjee. 1833: State supported Ministration in India. Both Anglican & RC Churches.
1833: Licences to evangelize in EIC territories removed. Dilemma: Chuch, part of Govt. ; Mission wasn’t.
Pages prior to above excerpts speak of dilemma of EIC w.r.t Hindu/Muslim religious institutions. In UK, all Trusts were Public Trusts.
In Desh though, there were tonnes of ‘Private Trusts’. This was difficult to handle for EIC. They found ways & brought temples/masjids under loose admin control. So, effectively, H/M/X institutions all became part of Govt. Now, comes wrench in the plans: Jati (“caste”)
1834: Velalar converted Xns didn’t want a SC priest. EIC washed its hands off & separated the Church from the State. Note: Only the Church. Ok? Thus, the Church got autonomy while others didnt’. 8/n [lost google books access
There is no area in the agrarian history of eastern India that Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri has not traversed. His journey began with his 1956 contribution in Bengal Past and Present, on “Some Problems of the Peasantry of Bengal after the Permanent Settlement.” His extensive opus surveys the agrarian economy of eastern India and all its protagonists: peasant households, zamindars and the state, non-peasant rural agents such as moneylenders, affluent landholders, farmers, and agrarian intermediaries (jotedars), all of whom played their decisive role in the rural agrarian structure of eastern India. His later research explored the impact of colonial rule on tribes and forest dwellers, who were in the process of transition to quasi-peasant communities by the middle of the twentieth century. In his pioneering work, The Growth of Commercial Agriculture in Bengal: 1757–1957, which developed out of his doctoral thesis, Chaudhuri discussed the two important phenomena that shaped the contours of the agrarian economy of Bengal—first, the demographic factor, namely population growth, combined with a simultaneous growth of agricultural production; second, the role of external demand that determined peasant production for the market. He placed value, additionally, on factors such as climate change, natural disasters, and political instability arising out of war and invasions, which affected agricultural production in India.
It is difficult to do justice to B. B. Chaudhuri’s academic work given its depth and range. An inadequate attempt is made here under four broad heads: (i) his concept of the peasantry; (ii) the growth of commercial agriculture in eastern India; (iii) the process of ‘depeasantization’ by which small and marginal peasants gradually lost their land and turned into sharecroppers or hired labor; and finally, (iv) the more or less forcible induction of a large number of tribes and forest dwellers into settled agriculture, resulting in spates of rebellion. The essays in this volume are on diverse themes. A number are on different aspects of the agrarian world, the major subject of Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri’s academic research. Many other papers discuss aspects of social and cultural history, which have always interested and inspired Prof. Chaudhuri. There are three essays on Rabindranath Tagore, the towering figure he venerates like most intellectuals of his generation from Bengal, and with whom he also happens to share his own birthday.